Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-okwd-5_26-cv-00602-1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RAUL ANGEL GUTIERREZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-26-602-J ) UNKNOWN OFFICERS, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). [Doc. No. 1]. The matter was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). Thereafter, Plaintiff moved to voluntarily dismiss the case. [Doc. No. 8]. Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s motion be granted [Doc. No. 9] and he did not object, thus waiving his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9], GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 8], and DISMISSESS the case without prejudice. Plaintiff’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of June, 2026.