Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-casd-3_26-cv-00740-0

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · 2026-06-10

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:51:37

1 
26-cv-740-RSH-VET 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
MICHAEL WHITE, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT, 
et al., 
Defendants. 

 
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO 
SHOW CAUSE 
 
 
 
On May 19, 2026, the Court issued an Orde r to Show Cause as to why Plaintiff’s 
claims against Defendant North County Tr ansit District (“NCTD”) should not be 
dismissed for failure to prosecu te. On June 8, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary 
Dismissal as to NCTD. ECF No . 8. The Notice satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule 
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i ) and is effective upon filing. See United States v. 475 
Martin Lane , 545 F.3d 1134, 1145–46 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims 
against NCTD are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 
/// 
/// 
/// 
Case 3:26-cv-00740-RSH-VET Document 10 Filed 06/10/26 PageID.<pageID> 
Page 1 of 2
 
2 
26-cv-740-RSH-VET 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
In light of the above, the Court DISCHARGES its May 19, 2026 Order to Show 
Cause. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: June 9, 2026 
 ____________________ 
 H o n . R o b e r t S . H u i e 
 United States District Judge 
Case 3:26-cv-00740-RSH-VET Document 10 Filed 06/10/26 PageID.<pageID> 
Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight