govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-2_26-cv-02105-0

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
JULIE A. MECKFESSEL-POLETTI, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
WORKDAY, INC., 
Defendant. 
___________________________________ 
 
JULIE A. MECKFESSEL POLETTI, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
WORKDAY, INC., 
Defendant. 
 
No. 2:25-cv-01315-DJC-CSK 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No. 2:26-cv-02105-DAD-AC 
 
RELATED CASE ORDER 
 
Examination of these actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of 
Local Rule 123(a). Both actions involve the common parties, are based on the same or 
a similar claim, and raise similar questions of fact and law. See Local Rule 123(a)(1), 
(3). Accordingly, the assignment of these matters to the same judge is likely to effect a 
substantial savings of judicial effort and is likely to be convenient for the parties. 

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 2 
 
 
The parties should be aware that relating cases under Rule 123 causes the 
actions to be assigned to the same judge, it does not consolidate the actions. Under 
Rule 123, related cases are generally assigned to the judge to whom the first filed 
action was assigned. 
As a result, it is hereby ORDERED that 2:26-cv-02105 is reassigned from the 
District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire to the undersigned 
and Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the 
reassigned case shall be shown as 2:26-cv-02105-DJC-CSK. 
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment 
in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated: June 10, 2026 
Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 

Passage view · GavelSight