Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-1_26-cv-03529-0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BONIFACIO BALTAZAR FERNANDO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, Respondents. No. 1:26-cv-03529-DJC-JDP RELEASE ORDER A# 240-398-199 Petitioner Bonifacio Baltazar Fernando is an immigration detainee proceeding with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1). The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised in the Petition. See Morillo v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv- 01533-DJC-AC, 2025 WL 3190899 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2025); see also E.L.D.M. v. Becerra, No. 1:25-cv-01906-DJC-JDP, 2025 WL 3707140 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, the Court directed Respondents to file a return showing cause why the Court should not grant a writ of habeas corpus and identify any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court’s prior orders. (ECF No. 5.) Respondents acknowledge that “there appears to be no substantive distinction between this case and the cases cited in the Court’s minute order . . . .” (ECF No. 6 at 1.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Accordingly, as Respondents have not made any new legal arguments and have not identified any factual or legal issues in this case that would distinguish it from the Court’s prior decisions cited above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED for the reasons stated in those prior orders. Respondents are ORDERED to immediately release Petitioner Bonifacio Baltazar Fernando from their custody. Respondents shall not impose any additional restrictions on Petitioner, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre- deprivation/custody hearing. If the government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than seven (7) days’ notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre- deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter pursuant to section 1226(a) and its implementing regulations, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. This Order does not address the circumstances in which Respondents may detain Petitioner in the event Petitioner becomes subject to an executable final order of removal. Respondents shall file a status report within five (5) days confirming Petitioner’s release. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve Golden State Annex with a copy of this Order. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to close this case and enter judgment for Petitioner. This Order resolves all pending motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 10, 2026 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE