Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-tned-3_22-cr-00015-0

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee · 2026-06-09

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:42:54

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 
 ) 
 Plaintiff, ) 
 ) 
v. ) 
 ) 
MISTY C. CARDIN, ) No.: 3:22-CR-15-TAV-JEM-1 
 ) 
 Defendant, ) 
 ) 
and ) 
 ) 
SOUTHLAND REALTORS, INC., ) 
 ) 
 Garnishee. ) 
 
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 
 
This criminal matter is before the Court on the government’s Motion for Order of 
Continuing Garnishment [Doc. 35], in which the government moves for the entry of an 
order of continuing garnishment pursuant to the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 
specifically 28 U.S.C. § 3205, against the non-exempt earnings of defendant. 
I. Background 
Pursuant to a written plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to wire fraud , in 
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 [Docs. 3, 12 ]. Defendant was sentenced to 6 months’ 
imprisonment and 6 months’ home detention, for a total effective sentence of 12 months 
[Docs. 25, 26]. Defendant was also ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $125,267.41 
[Docs. 25, 26]. PageID
#: <pageID>
2 
 
An Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment was filed by the government, 
and a Writ of Continuing Garnishment was duly issued and served upon Southland 
Realtors, Inc. (“Garnishee”) [Docs. 30, 31, 33 ]. Pursuant to the Writ of Continuing 
Garnishment, Garnishee filed an Answer on May 8, 2026, stating that, at the time of the 
service of the Writ, Garnishee had custody, control, or possession of personal property 
belonging to defendant in the form of non-exempt, disposable earnings [Doc. 34]. 
Defendant was personally served with a copy of the Writ of Continuing 
Garnishment and notified of the right to object, to assert exemptions, and request a hearing 
before this Court [Docs. 31, 32]. Defendant did not file an objection, nor did she request a 
hearing or assert any exemption. 
The government submits that the current restitution balance, as of the date of the 
government’s filing, is $119,478.12 [Doc. 35, p. 2]. And because defendant has not paid 
restitution as ordered, the government took action to enforce this restitution debt by filing 
an Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment [Doc. 30, p. 2]. 
II. Applicable Law 
The Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (“MVRA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663A –3664, 
requires sentencing courts to order criminal defendant to pay restitution to their victims. 
The MVRA permits the government to enforce a restitution order “by all other available 
and reasonable means,” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(1)(A), including “in accordance with the 
practices and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment under Federal law or State 
law.” 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a); see id. § 3613(f). PageID
#: <pageID>
3 
 
The Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., 
sets forth the civil enforcement procedures used by the United States to recover monies 
owed under a restitution order. 28 U.S.C. § 3001(a)(1). Under the FDCPA, the United 
States may seek, and the court may issue, a writ of garnishment against a debtor’s property, 
including non-exempt disposable earnings , “in which the debtor has a substantial 
nonexempt interest and which is in the possession, custody, or control of a person ot her 
than the debtor, in order to satisfy the judgment against the debtor .” See 28 U.S.C. 
§ 3205(a). The government must then serve the writ on the garnishee and debtor. Id. 
§ 3205(c)(3). The garnishee must file an answer with the court and serve a copy of its 
answer on the debtor and the government. Id. § 3205(c)(4). 
A debtor may file a written objection to an answer to a writ of garnishment and 
request a hearing within twenty days after receipt of the answer. See id. § 3205(c)(5). The 
debtor “shall state the grounds for the objection and bear the burden of proving such 
grounds.” Id. “While § 3205(c)(5) does not limit the purposes of a hearing like § 3202(d) 
does, the court retains the discretion to decide whether the objection warrants a hearing.” 
United States v. Kilpatrick, No. 22-MC-51143, 2024 WL 4678871, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 
5, 2024) (citation omitted); United States v. Lavigne, 734 F. Supp. 3d 654, 658 (E.D. Mich. 
2024) (quoting United States v. Miller , 588 F. Supp. 2d 789, 797 (W.D. Mich. 2008) 
(collecting cases)) (“A hearing is not necessary, however, ‘where the objection is plainly 
without merit, or where the objection [is] simply a matter of statutory interpretation.’”). PageID
#: <pageID>
4 
 
III. Analysis 
Defendant has not raised any issue that warrants further consideration regarding the 
writ issued and in turn, a hearing. 
IV. Conclusion 
Upon the Court’s review of the government’s motion, the motion [Doc. 35] is 
GRANTED. 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Garnishee, or its successors and assigns, shall 
pay into the hands of the United States Attorney’s Office, at least monthly, defendant’s 
nonexempt disposable earnings (as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 3002(9)), which is the lesser of: 
1. Twenty-five percent (25%) of defendant’s total disposable earnings; or 
 
2. All amounts of defendant’s disposable earnings in excess of thirty times the 
federal minimum hourly wage —i.e., the amount by which defendant’s 
disposable earnings exceed $217.50 per week. 
 
See 15 U.S.C. § 1673(a). 
To calculate disposable earnings (as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 3002(5)-(6)), Garnishee 
shall subtract the following from any and all compensation paid or payable for personal 
services, whether denominated as wages, salary, commissions, bonuses, or otherwise: 
1. Federal Income Tax; 
2. Federal Social Security Tax; 
3. State Income Tax (if any); 
4. Occupational Tax (if any); and 
5. Ordered Child Support (if any). 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Garnishee, or its successors and assigns, shall 
remit to the United States Attorney’s Office the non-exempt disposable earnings that have PageID
#: <pageID>
5 
 
or should have been garnished from defendant’s earnings since service of the Writ of 
Continuing Garnishment on May 5, 2026. 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these sums are to be applied upon the judgment 
rendered in this cause in the sum of $125,267.41, upon which there is an unpaid balance of 
$119,478.12 as of June 2, 2026. These deductions are to continue until the unpaid balance 
is fully paid and satisfied. 
Checks should be made payable to: 
Clerk, U.S. District Court 
and mailed to: 
US Clerk of Court 
800 Market Street, Suite 130 
Knoxville, TN 37902. 
 
 ENTER: 
s/ Thomas A. Varlan 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PageID
#: <pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight