Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-paed-5_08-cr-00553-4

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · 2025-07-29

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:48:45

1 
 
 
 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 : CRIMINAL ACTION 
v. : 
 : No. 08-553-01 
ARGENIS URENA 
 
 ORDER 
 
 AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2025, it is hereby ORDERED that: 
1. The Defendant’s motion for compassionate relief [Doc. 122] is DENIED without 
prejudice to renew depending on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Rutherford v. 
United States, 2025 WL 1603603 (June 6, 2025). 
2. The Defendant’s supplemental motion for compassionate relief [Doc. 126] is 
DENIED with prejudice. 
3. The Defendant’s supplemental motion for compassionate relief [Doc. 128] is 
DENIED with prejudice. 
4. The Defendant’s supplemental motion for compassionate relief [Doc. 131] is 
DENIED with prejudice. 
 BY THE COURT: 
 
 /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl 
 JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J. 

Passage view · GavelSight