govinfo:USCOURTS-flsd-1_25-cv-23377-5

1 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 1:25-cv-23377-LEIBOWITZ/LOUIS 
 
 
JETCHILL LTD., 
               Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
SHENZHEN JIRUI MINGHUI TRADING 
COMPANY, 
 
               Defendant. 
________________________________/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
 
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate 
Judge Lauren F. Louis [ECF No. 103] (the “R&R”), filed on May 22, 2026, recommending Plaintiff’s 
Motion for Default Judgment be granted, and that Plaintiff be awarded damages in the total amount 
of $1,006,802.82 as well as attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $42,853.85.  [ Id. at 1, 2 0].  
Defendant did not file a timely objection to the R&R within the objection period.  Upon review of 
the R&R, the Complaint, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, relevant portions of the record, 
and the governing law, the undesigned AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 
for the reasons discussed below. 
In reviewing a Report and Recommendation, the district court “shall make a de novo 
determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to 
which objection is made.”  28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).  “Parties filing objections to a magistrate’s report 
and recommendation must specifically identify thos e findings objected to.  Frivolous, conclusive, or 
general objections need not be considered by the district court.”  United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 
1361 (11th  Cir. 2009) (quoting Marsden v. Moore , 847 F.2d 1536, 1548 (11 th Cir. 1988)) (internal 
Case 1:25-cv-23377-DSL   Document 104   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2026   Page 1 of 2
2 
 
quotation marks omitted).  Absent objection, the district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 
or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate [judge],” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), 
and “need only satisfy itself that there is no cle ar error on the face of the record” to accept the 
recommendation.  Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment, subdivision (b). 
In the absence of any objection to the R&R, the Court’s own review finds no error.  
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 
1.  The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 103] is ADOPTED  
  AND AFFIRMED and fully incorporated into this Order for all purposes. 
2.  Plaintiff’s Motion for a Default Judgment [ECF No. 93] is GRANTED. 
3. Plaintiff is directed to send a proposed Final Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil  
  Procedure 58(a) in Word format to leibowitz@flsd.uscourts.gov no later than June  
  15, 2026. 
4. The Clerk  is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.  All deadlines are terminated, and any 
  pending motions (other than ECF No. 93) are DENIED AS MOOT. 
DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on June 8, 2026. 
         
 
 
cc: counsel of record 
Case 1:25-cv-23377-DSL   Document 104   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2026   Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight