Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-2_10-cv-02009-39

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California · 2024-05-29

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:42:07

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 1 
Order (2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB) 
 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
DANNY MURPHY COSTON, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al., 
Defendants. 

ORDER 
 
 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Daniel Murphy Coston’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to 
strike the Answer of Defendant Randall Hale (“Defendant Hale”) and enter Defendant Hale’s 
default. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Hale has failed to 
defend the action and has completely ceased participating in this litigation. Defendant Hale’s 
Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby stricken and Defendant Hale’s default is hereby entered. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: May 29, 2024 
 
 

Passage view · GavelSight