Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-22780-3

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · 2026-06-05

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 1:22-cv-22780-GAYLES/TORRES  
 
MARIE ROSENA GILLES-JEAN, 
 
 Plaintiff, 
 
v.  
 
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., 
 
 Defendant. 
___________________________________________/ 
 
ORDER 
 
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.’s 
(“Defendant”) Motion for Judgment  on the Pleadings  (“Motion”). [ECF No. 98].  On April 17, 
2023, the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for a ruling on all pre-trial, 
non-dispositive matters and a R eport and Recommendation on all dispositive matters.  [ECF No. 
51]. On May 11, 2026, Judge Torres issued his report, recommending that the Motion be denied. 
[ECF No. 125]. Defendant timely objected to Judge Torres’ Report and Recommendation. [ECF 
No. 140].   
A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The objected portions of the report and recommendation 
are accorded de novo review if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party 
disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Civ. 
P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objection is made 
are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C. , 
199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem,  Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 
Case 1:22-cv-22780-DPG   Document 141   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2026   Page 1 of 2
2 
784 (11th Cir. 2006). After conducting a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees with Judge 
Torres’ well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that the Motion should be denied.  
CONCLUSION 
Therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 
(1) The Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 125], is ADOPTED in full.
(2) Defendant Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings,
[ECF No. 98], is DENIED.
DO
NE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 5th day of June, 2026. 
________________________________
 
DARRIN P. GAYLES 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
Case 1:22-cv-22780-DPG   Document 141   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2026   Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight