govinfo:USCOURTS-akd-4_25-cv-00034-1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 
LINDSAY COOLEY, 
 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, 
FAIRBANKS CORRECTIONAL 
CENTER, and JUDICIAL SERVICES, 
 
Defendants. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
LINDSAY COOLEY, 
 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
MARYANN SANDERS, FAIRBANKS 
CORRECTIONAL CENTER 
MEDICAL, and MEDICAL ACTION 
COMMITTEE, 
 
Defendants. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
OMNIBUS ORDER 
On January 26, 2026, the Court issued a combined Screening Order 
addressing the two above captioned cases f iled by self-represented prisoner 
Lindsay Alan Cooley (“ Plaintiff”). The Court dismissed each of Plaintiff's 
Complaints for failing to adequately state a claim for which relief may be granted 
but granted Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint or a Notice of 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 2 of 10 
Voluntary Dismissal within 60 days of the date of the order, or by March 26, 2026.1 
On February 2, 2026, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address, and on that 
same date, the Clerk mailed Plaintiff a copy of the Screening Order and a copy of 
the docket sheet in each case to Plaintiff at the Anchorage Correctional Complex.2 
On March 23, 2026, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff that was filed 
in each case .3 In that letter, Plaintiff claims he has been unable to obtain an 
attorney and that “you even sent me paperwork of attorneys” that “was all just bad 
information.”4 In the letter Plaintiff also states that he needs to obtain an attorney 
and asks the Court to stay his cases until November 2026, when he expects to be 
released from custody. 
The Court does not provide names, phone numbers, or contact information 
for attorneys to self- represented litigants. And there is no constitutional right to 
appointed counsel in a civil action. 5 A federal court “may request an attorney to 
represent any person unable to afford counsel.” 6 However, a district court’s 
decision to request counsel for a self -represented litigant in a civil action is 
 
1 Docket 5. 
2 Docket 6. 
3 Docket 7 in each case. 
4 Docket 7. 
5 See Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431, 441 (2011) (“[T]he Sixth Amendment does not 
govern civil cases.”); Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Generally, a 
person has no right to counsel in civil actions.”). 
6 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 3 of 10 
discretionary and granted only in exceptional circumstances, 7 which Plaintiff has 
failed to establish in this case. Further, although 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) permits a 
court to request a volunteer attorney, this Court currently has no list of volunteer 
attorneys from which it may request counsel to represent Plaintiff. 
The January 2026 Screening Order addressed the filings it had received 
from Plaintiff in each case and enclosed the documents listed at the end of that 
order.
8 The Screening Order also informed Plaintiff that it would not send copies 
of his documents to the Alaska Legal Services Corporation. The Screening Order 
also informed Plaintiff that letters are not a proper vehicle for requesting relief .9 
Another copy of t he Screening Order is enclosed with this order for Plaintiff’s 
reference. 
A court is not required respond to letters or other improper filings made by 
litigants. Nonetheless, the Court will briefly address the remaining concerns raised 
in Plaintiff’s letter. However, the Court will not respond to future requests 
made by Plaintiff in the form of a letter. In order to seek relief from the Court, a 
 
7 Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.1980). 
8 Docket 5 at 20 (“With this order, the Clerk is directed to send: (1) two copies of form 
PS01, with “FIRST AMENDED” written above the title “Prisoner’s Complaint Under the 
Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. § 1983”; (2) two copies of form PS09, Notice of Voluntary 
Dismissal; (3) form PS23, Notice of Change of Address; and (4) a copy of the docket 
sheet in each case.”). 
9 See Docket 5 at 15-16 (providing information on filing motions and cautioning that 
future requests made in the form of a letter will not be considered). 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 4 of 10 
party must file a motion.10 Except for alternative requests for relief or as otherwise 
provided by rule or order of the Court, each motion must only contain one request 
for relief.11 A motion should contain the information identified in the caption of this 
order and should be titled “Motion for ( state the relief requested).” For 
nondispositive motions—motions that do not resolve the main claims or end the 
case—a litigant must include a proposed order that the Court can issue if the 
motion is granted.
12 The proposed order helps to clarify what the moving party is 
asking the Court to order. 
Liberally construing Plaintiff letter, Plaintiff requests that the Court: 
1. Stay or postpone his cases until approximately November 7, 2026, when 
Plaintiff anticipates release from the physical custody of DOC; 
2. Assist him in identifying the “John Doe” officer referenced in the 
Complaint; 
3. Order DOC to preserve a surveillance video; and 
4. Determine Plaintiff’s location and direct correspondence to him at that 
address.13 
 
10 See Fed. R. Civ. P . 7(b)(1) (“A request for a court order must ... state with particularity 
the grounds for seeking the order” and “state the relief sought.”); Alaska Local Civil Rule 
7.1(a) (requiring all written motions and oppositions to include “a brief statement” of the 
requested relief and supporting authorities). 
11 Local Civil Rule 7.1(e); see also Local Civil Rule 5.1(f)(2). 
12 Local Civil Rule 7.1(b). 
13 Docket 7. 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 5 of 10 
For the reasons explained below, each of Plaintiff’s requests are DENIED. 
I. Stay of Proceedings 
Plaintiff requests that the Court “postpone this case” until his anticipated 
release on November 7, 2026, explaining he is currently incarcerated at the 
Anchorage Correctional Center and lacks a law librarian’s assistance or an 
attorney. The Court recognizes that incarcerated litigants often face barriers to 
meeting deadlines, including facility lockdowns, limited access to the law library, 
restricted legal supplies, and delays in outgoing mail. However, the Court declines 
to grant the requested stay in either case. Rather, the Court notes that cases 
brought by self-represented prisoner civil litigants routinely proceed without a stay 
during the prisoner’s term of incarceration and no compelling reason to deviate 
from that norm has been advanced here. 
The Court Screening Order directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint 
by the end of March 2026. Instead, Plaintiff asked to postpone this case. Because 
the Court is denying that relief, Plaintiff is accorded an additional 60 days from 
the date of this order to file a First Amended Complaint in each case. No 
further extensions to file an amended complaint will be granted absent 
extraordinary circumstances. 
If Plaintiff does not wish to proceed with either case at this time, Plaintiff may 
file a Notice of Voluntarily Dismiss al in each case he elects to close. Such a 
dismissal will be without prejudice to refiling his claims at a later date, subject to 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 6 of 10 
all applicable procedural requirements , including the applicable statute of 
limitations. 
II. John Doe Defendants 
Although federal courts do not generally favor actions against unknown 
“Doe” defendants,14 a plaintiff may sue unnamed defendants when the identity of 
the alleged defendants is not known before filing the complaint. 15 But a plaintiff 
must try to ascertain the name of any unknown officer without assistance from the 
Court. The Court will not investigate the names and identities of unnamed 
defendants. If a case survives screening, a plaintiff may be afforded an opportunity 
for limited, preliminary discovery to identify the names of any Doe defendants 
“unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover their identities,”
16 and only after 
the Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has attempted all other reasonable means of 
identifying John Doe without success. 
III. Preservation Order 
Plaintiff's request that the Court order DOC to preserve video footage is 
premature. Should any amended complaint proceed beyond the screening stage, 
the Court will order service and issue an order setting a schedule for discovery and 
dispositive motions. Neither party may file motions concerning discovery issues 
 
14 See Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999). 
15 Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). 
16 Gillespie, 629 F.2d at 642. 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 7 of 10 
without first seeking, in good faith, to resolve the matter with each other as required 
by Rule 37(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.17 
Parties are under an ongoing duty to preserve evidence which they know—
or reasonably should know—is relevant to an action. This obligation, backed by a 
court’s power to impose sanctions for the destruction of such evidence, is generally 
sufficient to secure the preservation of relevant evidence.18 Plaintiff may submit a 
written request to the prison asking that any surveillance footage or other 
recordings relevant to the alleged incident be preserved. If this litigation proceeds 
beyond the screening stage, Plaintiff may seek such materials through the normal 
discovery process. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for a preservation order is 
DENIED without prejudice. 
IV. Plaintiff’s Contact Information 
Plaintiff asks the Court to “find out where I’m incarcerated at and send me a 
response.”
19 According to Alaska’s automated inmate information and notification 
service, Plaintiff remains housed at the Anchorage Correctional Complex .20 This 
 
17 Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) (“The motion must include a certification that the movant has 
in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make 
disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action.”); District of Alaska 
Local Civil Rule 37.1. (“The certification required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) must be in 
the first paragraph of a discovery motion.”). 
18 See Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43-46 (1991). 
19 Docket 7 at 2. 
20 Information regarding inmates in the custody of the Alaska Department of 
Corrections, such as an inmate's current location and tentative release date, is available 
through the Victim Information and Notification Everyday (“VINE”) service at 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 8 of 10 
order will be sent to Plaintiff at that address. However, it is not the responsibility of 
the Court, nor its administrative staff, to track the whereabouts of each litigant , 
monitor inmate transfers, or independently update a party's address of record. 
Should Plaintiff be transferred to another facility, Plaintiff is responsible for 
promptly updating his contact information in each case by filing a Notice of Change 
of Address. Plaintiff may use the Court’s Form PS23,21 or he may file a document 
titled “Notice of Change of Address” that clearly states his new mailing address 
and its effective date. The Notice must not include requests for any other relief or 
other information. 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 
1. The Court will not consider or respond to future requests made by 
Plaintiff in the form of a letter. Any request for relief must be filed as a separate 
motion that compl ies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the District of 
Alaska Local Civil Rules, and all Court orders. 
2. Plaintiff’s request for a stay of these proceedings is DENIED. 
3. In each case, Plaintiff is accorded 60 days from the date of this order 
to file either a: 
 
www.vinelink.com. 
21 Although the Court provides forms that are required for certain filings, the Court does 
not require a specific form to update an address. However, a Notice of Change of 
Address form, PS23, may be obtained from the Clerk of Court, if needed. 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 9 of 10 
a. First Amended Complaint, in which Plaintiff revises his 
complaint to address the deficiencies identified in the January 2026 
Screening Order. An amended complaint should be on the Court’s 
form, which is being provided to Plaintiff with this order; OR 
b. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal , in which Plaintiff elects to close 
and end the case. 
4. If Plaintiff does not file either a First Amended Complaint or Notice of 
Voluntary Dismissal on the Court’s form within 60 days of the date of this order, 
each case shall be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) without further notice 
to Plaintiff for failure to state a claim. 
5. If a case is dismissed for failure to state a claim, it will count as a strike 
against Plaintiff under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which may limit Plaintiff’s ability to bring 
future civil rights cases in federal court. A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal does not 
count as a strike.
22 
2. Plaintiff’s request that the Court obtain an unidentified officer’s name 
is DENIED. 
3. Plaintiff’s request for a preservation order is DENIED without 
prejudice. 
 
22 Spencer v. Barajas, 140 F.4th 1061 (9th Cir. 2025). 

Case No. 4:25-cv-00029-SLG, Cooley v. Department of Public Safety, et al. 
Case No. 4:25-cv-00034-SLG, Cooley v. Sanders, et al. 
Omnibus Order 
Page 10 of 10 
4. Plaintiff’s request that the Court locate Plaintiff and update his contact 
information on the Court’s docket is DENIED. 
5. If Plaintiff fails to keep a current address on file with the Court, that 
may result in the dismissal of a case without further notice to Plaintiff. 23 
6. With this order, the Clerk is directed to send: (1) two copies of form 
PS01, with “FIRST AMENDED” written above the title “Prisoner’s Complaint Under 
the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. § 1983”; (2) two copies of form PS09, Notice of 
Voluntary Dismissal; (3) form PS23, Notice of Change of Address; and (4) one 
copy of the Screening Order at Docket 5. 
DATED this 5th day of June 2026, at Anchorage, Alaska. 
/s/ Sharon L. Gleason 
SHARON L. GLEASON 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
23 See Alaska Local Civil Rule 11.1(b)(3) (authorizing dismissal of a case when Court 
orders or other mail sent to a self-represented plaintiff at the address of record are 
returned to the Court as undeliverable). See also Alaska Local Civil Rule 11.1(b)(2) 
(“Self-represented parties must keep the court and other parties advised of the party’s 
current address and telephone number.”). 

Passage view · GavelSight