Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-ohsd-2_04-cr-00183-3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. Case Number 2:04-cr-183
Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
JEFFREY DAVID MUNNERLYN,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey David Munnerlyn’s Notice of
Withdrawal of Pleadings Seeking Compassionate Release. (ECF No. 85.) On May 17, 2021,
Defendant, proceeding pro se , filed a motion seeking compassionate release. (ECF No. 67.) The
next day, the Court appointed counsel to assist Defendant , who filed a supplemental motion on
July 8, 2021. (ECF No. 70.) The M otions argued that a sentencing disparity created by the First
Step Act’s nonretroactivity constituted “ extraordinary and compelling reasons ” to justify
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). (ECF Nos. 67, 71.)
On May 28, 2026, the United States Supreme Court decided in Rutherford v. United States,
608 U.S.___, 2026 WL 1485535 (2026), that a sentencing disparity stemming from the First Step
Act’s nonretroactivity i s not an extraordinary or compelling reason to warrant compassionate
release. As a result, Defendant states that he cannot distinguish his compassionate-release request
from Rutherford and notifies the Court of his intention to withdraw his Motions. Accordingly,
(ECF No. 67) Motion for Compassionate Release and (ECF No. 70) First Motion for
Compassionate Release are DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6/4/2026 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case: 2:04-cr-00183-EAS Doc #: 86 Filed: 06/04/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>