govinfo:USCOURTS-flsd-1_26-cv-20381-1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO. 1:26-cv-20381-LEIBOWITZ/SHAW-WILDER 
 
GABRIEL JULIO SOSA, 
 
  Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
CITY OF MIAMI and JOHN DOE 
OFFICERS 1-5,  
 
 Defendants. 
________________________________/ 
 
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
 
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation by United States 
Magistrate Judge Detra Shaw-Wilder [ECF No. 9] (the “R&R”), filed on April 28, 2026.  Judge Shaw-
Wilder recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice  for failure to comply with 
court orders.  No objections to the R&R were filed during the 14 -day objection period.  Upon due 
consideration of the R&R, the filings, the applicable law, and the record, the Court ADOPTS and 
AFFIRMS the R&R [ECF No. 9]. 
“In order to challenge the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge, a party must 
file written objections which shall specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings and 
recommendation to which objection is made and the specific basis for objection.”  Macort v. Prem, Inc., 
208 F. App’x 781, 783 (11th Cir. 2006) (cleaned up).  The objections must also present “supporting 
legal authority.”  S.D. Fla. L. Mag. J.R. 4(b).  Once a district court receives “objections meeting the 
specificity requirement set out above,” it must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 
report to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings 
or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”  Macort, 208 F. App’x at 783–84 (cleaned up).  To 
Case 1:26-cv-20381-DSL   Document 10   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2026   Page 1 of 2
2 
 
the extent a party fails to object to parts of the magistrate judge’s report, those portions are reviewed 
for clear error.  Id. at 784 (cleaned up).   
The parties have not submitted any objections to Judge Shaw-Wilder’s R&R, and the time to 
do so has passed.  As such, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error only.  Upon this review, 
the Court finds no error whatsoever, and further notes that Judge Shaw-Wilder’s R&R is correct.  The 
Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. 
 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 
1.  The Magistrate Judge ’s Report and Recommendation [ ECF No. 9 ] is ADOPTED 
and made a part of this Order for all purposes. 
2.  This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 
3.  The Clerk  is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. 
4. The Clerk  is further directed to CLOSE this case.  All deadlines are TERMINATED, 
and any pending motions are DENIED as moot. 
 
DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on May 13, 2026.  
       
  
        
       
 
 
 
 
cc: counsel of record 
 Gabriel Julio Sosa 
125 W 25 St. 
Apt 3 
Hialeah, FL 33010 
PRO SE  
Case 1:26-cv-20381-DSL   Document 10   Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2026   Page 2 of 2

Passage view · GavelSight