Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-caed-2_22-cv-01637-10

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California · 2026-06-04

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:32:21

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
DANIEL ROY SMITH, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
ANGIE HOOD-MEDLAND, et al., 
Defendants. 
No. 2:22-CV-1637-WBS-DMC-P 
 
ORDER 
 
 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 
Eastern District of California local rules. 
 On April 17, 2026, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 
herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file 
objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations 
have been filed. 
 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 2 
 
 
 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 
 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 17, 2026, ECF No. 46, are 
adopted in full. 
 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 42, is denied. 
 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further 
proceedings. 
Dated: June 3, 2026 
 
 
 
 

Passage view · GavelSight