Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-moed-4_24-cr-00620-0
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff, )
vs. ) No. 4:24-CR-620 MAL
)
JERRY SUTHERLIN, )
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial Date (Doc. [69]). Trial in
this matter is currently set for June 8, 2026. Counsel states additional time is needed to
allow the parties to conduct plea negotiations or, in the alternative, prepare for trial. The
Government does not oppose Defendant’s motion, and Defendant has filed an executed
Waiver of Speedy Trial (Doc. [70]).
For the reasons stated in Defendant’s motion, the Court finds that to deny
Defendant’s request for a continuance “would deny counsel . . . the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence,” 18
U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and that “the ends of justice served by the granting of such
continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy
trial.” 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Continue (Doc. [69]) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial in this matter is continued to July 6, 2026, at
9:00 a.m., in the courtroom of the undersigned.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the time between June 8, 2026, and July 6, 2026, is
excluded from the computation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3161(h)(7).
Dated this 4th day of June, 2026.
_______________________________________
MARIA A. LANAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case: 4:24-cr-00620-MAL Doc. #: 71 Filed: 06/04/26 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>