c56:Nos. 23 and 241

HOLLAND, District Judge.
This ease was tried at the same time before' the same jury that tried the indictments against the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company (Nos. 25. and 26 of March Sessions, 1910) 184 Fed.
•"43. A motion and a number of reasons for a new trial were filed. There is no reason set forth in this ease that has not, already been considered in the ease against the Philadelphia & Heading Railway Company, and, for the reasons stated in that case, the motion is overruled.

Passage view · GavelSight