Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-tned-3_14-cr-00089-4

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee · 2017-05-24

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:00

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 
AT KNOXVILLE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
vs. 
AMBER MURPHY 
)
)
)
)
)
 
 NO. 3:14-CR-00089 
 REEVES/GUYTON 
 
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
By judgment entered July 19, 2016, this court sentenced defendant to a term of 60 
months imprisonment following her guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture at least 5 but 
less than 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) 
and 841(b)(1)(B). Defendant did not appeal her conviction or sentence. Now before the 
court is defendant’s pro se motion for sentence reduction [R. 529]. 
Although styled as “2255 Minor Role Motion Amendment 794,” defendant in fact 
seeks a sentence reduction in light of Amendment 794, thus, the court will construe her 
filing as a motion brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), rather than as a motion to 
vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Amendment 794 became effective November 1, 2015, and was incorporated into 
the Guidelines. Defendant was sentenced to 60 months imprisonment on July 17, 2016, 
pursuant to the 2015 Guidelines, which incorporated Amendment 794. No motion was 
made by defendant asking for a minor role adjustment at sentencing, and the time for doing PageID
#: <pageID>
2
so has expired. Defendant’s conviction became final upon the expiration of the 14-day 
period for filing a notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A). 
Amendment 794 does not apply to convictions that have become final. 
Defendant’s reliance on United States v. Quintero-Leyva is misplaced. In Quintero-
Leyva, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that Amendment 794 
applies retroactively on direct appeal. The case did not hold, nor has any other case held, 
that relief under the amendment is available once a judgment becomes final. See Johnson 
v. United States, 2016 WL 6084018 (S.D.Ohio Oct. 17, 2016). 
Accordingly, defendant’s pro se motion for sentence reduction [R. 529] is 
DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 Enter: 
 ______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
____________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_
_
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEED STAATESS DDISTTRICCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT JUDGE PageID
#: <pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight