Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-ncmd-1_26-cv-00065-1

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina · 2026-05-29

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:52:39

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 
 
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON., 
 
 
 Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
 
VAN WORTH SHAW et al., 
 
 
 Defendants. 
 
 
 
 
 1:26-CV-65-DAB-JGM 
 
 
 ORDER 
 This matter is before the Court for review of the Order and Recommendation 
filed on May 5, 2026. (D.E. 2 .) The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing 
Plaintiff’s action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or provide an 
affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. The deadline for objections passed on May 
19, 2026, and no parties have objected to the Recommendation. 
 Because there are no objections, the Court “must ‘only satisfy itself that there 
is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” 
Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting 
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 72 advisory committee’s note). This Court has accordingly 
reviewed the Recommendation and concludes it contains no clear error. 
 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation 
(D.E. 2) is ADOPTED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 
 A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with 
this Order. 
This the 29th day of May, 2026. 
 
 /s/ David A. Bragdon 
 United States District Judge 

Passage view · GavelSight