Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-txsd-1_26-cv-00158-1
1 / 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
ANDRZEJ W., §
“Petitioner,” §
§
v. §
§
Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00158
WARDEN, EL VALLE DETENTION
CENTER, et al.,
“Respondents.”
§
§
§
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Habeas
Petition Subject to Refiling” (Dkt. No. 21) (“R&R”).
Since no objections were filed to the R&R, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions
for clear error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 21) is
hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28 U.S.C. § 2241)” (Dkt. No.
1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to refiling and the “Motion to Expedite”
(Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is INSTRUCTED to close this case.
SIGNED this May 28, 2026
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
May 28, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 1:26-cv-00158 Document 24 Filed 05/28/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1