Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-casd-3_24-cv-01463-0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALEKSANDR SHAMBASOV,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS,
Secretary of DHS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 24cv1463 L BJW
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
[Doc. No. 5]
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss this action as moot.
(ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Defendants
to adjudicate his pending Form I-589 asylum application. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants
contend that this action should be dismissed as moot because Plaintiff’s asylum
application has been approved. ( See ECF No. 10 -1.) Plaintiff has not filed an
opposition to Defendants’ motion, and the time to oppose has elapsed. See Civ. Local
R. 7.1(e)(2). A ccordingly, Defendants’ motion is granted as unopposed. See Civ.
Loc. Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c); Ghazali v. Moran , 46 F.3d 52, 53 -54 (9th Cir. 1995).
Alternatively, the motion is granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the
case has become moot. See City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 287 (2000) (“A
case is moot when the issues presented are no longer ‘live[.]’”); SEC v. Med. Comm.
Case 3:24-cv-01463-L-BJW Document 12 Filed 05/26/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 24cv1463-L-BJW
for Human Right s, 404 U.S. 403, 407 (1972) (federal courts lack jurisdiction over
moot cases).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 26, 2026
Case 3:24-cv-01463-L-BJW Document 12 Filed 05/26/26 PageID.<pageID> Page
2 of 2