Corpus: 543,223 opinions ·
3,177 judges ·
newest 2026-06-23 · expanding
Coverage ↗
Opinion
govinfo:USCOURTS-txsd-1_26-cv-00001-1
1 / 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
TOMAS S.H., §
“Petitioner,” §
§
v. §
§
Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-0001
JUAN AGUDELO , et al ., in their official
capacities,
“Respondents.”
§
§
§
ORDER
Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Petition”) ,
Respondents’ “Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt.
No. 6) (“MSJ” ), and the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation to Deny Petitioner’s Habeas
Petition” (Dkt. No. 11) (“R&R”).
The R&R was published on April 28, 2026, and objections to the R&R were due on May 12, 2026.
See Dkt. No. 11. Since no objections were filed to the magistrate’s ruling, the Court reviews the magistrate
judge’s conclusions for clear error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 11) is
hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the MSJ (Dkt. No. 6) is
DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case.
SIGNED this May 21, 2026
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
May 21, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 1:26-cv-00001 Document 12 Filed 05/21/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1