Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-txsd-1_26-cv-00001-1

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas · 2026-05-21

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:49:44

1 / 1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION 
 
TOMAS S.H.,  §  
“Petitioner,” §       
 §  
v.  § 
§ 
        Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-0001 
JUAN AGUDELO , et al ., in their official 
capacities,   
“Respondents.”  
§ 
§ 
§  
 
 
ORDER  
 Before the Court is Petitioner’s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Petition”) , 
Respondents’ “Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. 
No. 6) (“MSJ” ), and the  Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation  to Deny Petitioner’s Habeas 
Petition” (Dkt. No. 11) (“R&R”).  
The R&R was published on April 28, 2026, and objections to the R&R were due on May 12, 2026. 
See Dkt. No. 11. Since no objections were filed to the magistrate’s ruling, the Court reviews the magistrate 
judge’s conclusions for clear error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). 
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 11) is 
hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is  DENIED and the MSJ (Dkt. No. 6) is 
DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to close this case. 
 SIGNED this May 21, 2026 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
May 21, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 1:26-cv-00001     Document 12     Filed 05/21/26 in TXSD     Page 1 of 1

Passage view · GavelSight