Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

govinfo:USCOURTS-txed-9_20-cv-00003-1

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas · 2022-07-18

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:17:56

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
QUINCY NELSON §
VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:20cv3
KEN PAXTON, ET AL. §
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Quincy Nelson, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Zack
Hawthorn for consideration pursuant to applicable or ders of the court. The magistrate judge has
submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that a
motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiff be denied.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed
objections. 
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and
the applicable law. After careful consideration, the court is of the opinion the objections are without
merit. As a result of plaintiff’s transfer to another prison unit, the magistrate judge correctly
concluded that his request for preliminary injunctive relief is moot.
ORDER
Accordingly, the objections filed by plaintiff are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is
ADOPTED. The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 42) is DENIED. PageID #: 
<pageID> PageID #: 
<pageID>

Passage view · GavelSight