Corpus: 543,223 opinions · 3,177 judges · newest 2026-06-23 · expanding Coverage ↗
Opinion

c284:No. 9898

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · 1968-09-23

· GavelSight synced 2026-09-06 03:11:42

CLARK, Circuit Judge
(dissenting).
I do not regard the presence of the bloodstained $20 bill as essential in view of the other evidence in the case. Nor do I consider the entirely negative testimony imputed to the policeman by counsel as essential.

Passage view · GavelSight